Sports expertise supplier Sportradar is dealing with competitors complaints from rival Altenar Technologies over allegations that its unique sports activities information agreements limit entry for different sportsbook suppliers.
Altenar approached the European Commission and the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) on October 14, looking for regulatory intervention in a dispute that started earlier this yr.
The allegations concern Sportradar’s unique agreements with main sports activities organisations, together with Major League Baseball (MLB), the National Basketball Association (NBA), the National Hockey League (NHL) and the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
These partnerships give Sportradar rights to gather and distribute official sporting info, together with reside information used to calculate betting odds.
Altenar argues that the preparations restrict unbiased suppliers’ potential to compete within the sportsbook expertise market.
Competition Authorities Review Submitted Information
The European Commission has acknowledged receiving details about the dispute, though it stays unclear whether or not Altenar has formally registered a contest criticism.
“We have received market information on this matter, which we are assessing,” a Commission spokesperson stated.
The UK’s CMA is known to have obtained a criticism however has not opened an investigation. The regulator declined to touch upon particular person issues outdoors formal proceedings.
Altenar is looking for intervention to deal with what it considers unfair restrictions on entry to important sports activities information.
“We believe Sportradar is using its control of essential sports data to shut out businesses with a competing offer,” an Altenar spokesperson stated, according to The Straits Times.
The firm has additionally requested the CMA to think about interim measures restoring entry to related information and betting odds whereas the allegations are assessed.
Altenar maintains that bookmakers throughout the EU and UK ought to have entry to competing expertise suppliers underneath truthful industrial circumstances.
If regulators in the end set up violations of EU competitors regulation, the penalties may attain 10% of an organization’s annual worldwide turnover.
At current, authorities have introduced no formal findings towards Sportradar.
Existing Legal Dispute Extends Beyond Europe
The newest complaints comply with an antitrust lawsuit Altenar filed within the US District Court for the District of New Jersey in April 2026.
The proceedings accuse Sportradar of utilizing its unique league partnerships to monopolise the marketplace for official reside sports activities information and drawback competing sportsbook software program companies.
Altenar additionally initiated proceedings in London’s High Court when the dispute first emerged.
The firm’s allegations give attention to Sportradar’s place as each a provider of official sporting info and a supplier of betting expertise.
Sportradar distributes information to outstanding playing operators, together with companies owned by Flutter Entertainment, whereas sustaining industrial partnerships with main worldwide sports activities organisations comparable to FIFA.
Altenar believes these preparations give Sportradar a bonus when competing for sportsbook expertise contracts.
The corporations have additionally disputed how their US authorized proceedings needs to be dealt with.
Sportradar beforehand sought to maneuver the litigation into non-public arbitration in Zurich, referring to provisions in an current industrial settlement. Altenar opposed that request, arguing that its antitrust claims ought to stay earlier than a US federal courtroom.
The approaches to European regulators due to this fact add an additional dimension to an ongoing disagreement involving a number of jurisdictions.
Sportradar Denies Allegations and Criticises Complaints
Sportradar has rejected Altenar’s accusations and questioned the choice to publicise additional regulatory complaints whereas authorized proceedings stay energetic.
The firm stated it had been conscious since February 2026 that Altenar was contemplating submissions to competitors authorities in a number of jurisdictions.
A Sportradar spokesperson acknowledged:
“Altenar’s latest efforts to inflame the news agenda appear duplicative, unnecessary and serve as a thinly veiled attempt to assert pressure in the existing commercial disputes in process. Sportradar has and will continue to comply with antitrust and other laws wherever it does business.”
The firm additionally indicated that it had not obtained formal discover of the most recent alleged criticism.
The dispute raises questions on how unique sports activities information agreements function when rights holders grant entry to corporations that additionally compete within the betting expertise market.
For sportsbook operators, the problem issues the supply of unbiased suppliers able to offering reside betting merchandise utilizing official sporting info.
Altenar continues to hunt regulatory intervention, whereas Sportradar maintains that its enterprise practices adjust to relevant competitors legal guidelines.
Further proceedings will rely upon whether or not authorities determine to pursue formal investigations and how the present courtroom circumstances develop.
