Dara O’Kearney explains why some gamers will deal with the swings of poker higher in the event that they be taught Game Theory Optimal technique.

Generally talking taking part in a GTO fashion means you miss out on some worth towards unhealthy gamers whom you would exploit. However, a participant who learns GTO at micro stakes ought to in idea be worthwhile in any recreation. Of course in actuality the stress of the cash will all the time be there.
One of the explanation why some gamers keep away from taking part in an exploitative technique altogether is as a result of GTO is simpler from a mindset perspective. I’m reminded of a quote from Bertrand Russell which sums up the advantages of being a GTO participant, he stated “what men really want is not knowledge but certainty”.
Exploitative gamers should cope with way more uncertainty as a result of so many extra issues can go fallacious. Their assumptions about their opponents could be fallacious they usually discover themselves diverging very far off the sport tree. Opponent A would possibly diverge in a single route, Opponent B would possibly veer off a totally completely different a part of the sport tree. If an exploitative participant thinks their opponent is beneath bluffing, then that participant exhibits them a bluff, it may be traumatic. Were all their assumptions fallacious, or was it simply the one time the participant bluffed out of a whole bunch of missed alternatives? Exploitative gamers should be very forgiving of themselves.
GTO gamers would not have wherever close to the stress of this, as a result of they will often run a sim and get a solution as to whether or not they made a mistake. GTO by comparability is a one measurement suits all method the place you have been both appropriate, or you’re supplied with a solution to appropriate an error for the subsequent time.
GTO particular mindset points

There are mindset points that come from this, nevertheless. Because GTO entails combined frequencies it implies that usually most performs could be proper a small share of the time. You would possibly run a hand the place you made a seemingly unhealthy hero name and uncover, for stability functions, that the solver does it 12% of the time. You would possibly use this as a crutch to justify your entire unhealthy play.
Just as a result of one thing is allowed, doesn’t imply it isn’t a mistake. In the instance above, in case you do the hero name 100% of the time, it’s nonetheless an enormous punt. Do you actually name there simply 12% of the time? Probably not.
My pal Niall Farrell as soon as acquired drunk in a Daily Deepstack after busting the Main Event. He was very tilted and informed me that he ‘used numerous low frequency performs at a really excessive frequency’ which was a joke, however an correct evaluation of this explicit concern.
So to thrive from GTO you want to have the ability to make real assessments about how usually you actually are doing the minority combined actions. As a baseline start line it is best to attempt to keep on with the extra favoured actions the solver takes.
I’ll all the time advocate a mixture of GTO and exploitative technique based mostly on recreation choice, however in case you wrestle with uncertainty in poker, GTO actually is for you.
Dara O’Kearney’s new ebook Endgame Poker Strategy: The ICM Book is out now.